11/85 UNITED AIRLINES, NIPPON AIR CARGO-US-JAPAN NEGOTIATIONS - Aviation Constitution
In view of the overall trade deficit tht Japan has with the US it is
hard to believe that the Japanese aviation authorities believe
that they will be able to use the recent acquisition of PanAm's
Pacific routes to force the US to revise the existing air
agreement between the US and Japan, which the Japanese air
authorities have long called unequal and unfair. Their primary
complaint is that 60% of the 1.9 million passengers flying
between the US and Japan each year are Japanese, yet JAL only
carries 39% of the passengers. At a time when Japan
has exports to the US that are more than 2.5 times greater
than its imports from the US, it is surprising that the Japanese
are in a position to call the situation unfair, but that is
precisely what they are doing. They have siezed upon the Pacific
route acquisition by United as the perfect means to revise the
situation. The aviation agreement between the US and Japan is
unclear on whether a firm acquiring routes in this way is
automatically approved by the aviation authorities of the
respective nations. Under tha agreement, United must first obtain
approval from US authorities. Thereafter notification will be sent
to Japanese aviation authorities by the US Commerce Department
via the US Embassy and thereafter United must make its
application directly to Japanese aviation authorities. The
Japanese claim that they have the right to reject the application
and plan to use that right to wrest a revision of the current
aviation agreement with the US.
It seems strange that with American protectionist fevers
running at white hot levels the Japanese would dare to reject
America's largest airline and leave in limbo the status of such
a large group of air flights.
Japan Airlines, which for most of the postwar period has had
a monopoly--among Japanese airlines--in international flights,
and claims to be the world's largest international airline, now
appears terrified by the entry of United into its backyard. It is
comparing it to the 1281 invasion of Japan by the barbarian
Mongol's (Which created the myth that the homeland of Japan was
invincible and could not be defeated, until the Americas came
along.). It is calling this the "Pacific Aviation War."
United has 47,840 employees and 319 aircraft, with this soon
increasing to 382 aircraft, and operating profits of $564 million
in the most recent business year. It flies 1500 flights per day.
It flies to all 50 US states, 127 American cities, and Tokyo and
Hong Kong internationally. United has shown earlier that it can
use its massive network in marketing as it did in 1984 when it
offered major discounts on its domestic network for those taking
its Pacific flights. This proved quite a successful strategy, and
now with PanAm's routes added, the attraction is just that much
enhanced. Finally, United has the world's most advanced
computerized reservation system which is the most popular with
travel agents in the US.
Then there is Japan Airlines. It has 84 aircraft. Its earnings in
the past few years have never been all that great, what with 10
air crasher in 14 years. The most recent resulted in 524 deaths.
The cost of that crash and the 30-40% decline in passengers in
domestic routes are estimated to have wiped out recurring
profits for profits for the next three years. Domestic passengers
are walking away from JAL in Japan to take the trains.
Internationally, with JAL having an international monopoly,
Japanese passengers did not have much of a choice, unless they
wanted to take a foreign airline, which they would do, but would
prefer not to. Even before the August 1985 air crash JAL was
dependent on its Pacific routes, mostly to the US, for 40% of
its total international income, which itself accounts for 80% of
JAL's total income. Now however, with JAL's
accident record and its attraction of Russian jet fighters due to
sloppy flying, Japanese passengers are having to consider the
real risk in flying JAL as opposed to other lines. With United
entering the field with its superb attractions. JAL had good
reason for concern.
Earlier, the US and Japan had achieved an aviation accord in
late April, 1985. It did not cover the above problem with United
Airlines, as that happened later. Apart from the acquisition of
PanAm's routes by United, the aviation agreement provided that
three US sunbelt cities--Dallas Atlanta and Houston would be
opened to direct flights to Tokyo. Three additional US airlines
will be permitted to fly routes to Japan. Leading applicants are
expected to be Federal Express American Airlines, Delta Airlines,
Continental Airlines and Aloha Airlines. The agreement provided
that each country could take their choice of three of the
following routes: Nagoya-Honolulu, Tokyo-Honolulu, Tokyo-
Portland, Tokyo-Los Angeles, and Tokyo to new locations in the
US. JAL immediately announced plans to seek Tokyo-Houston and
Toyo-Atlanta routes and to increase its flights between Nagoya
and Saipan-Guam. Eastern Airlines applied for the Portland Tokyo route.
Under the April 1985 agreement Continental-Air Micronesia was permitted
to increase the number of its flights between Nagoya and Saipan-Guam. All
restrictions on the types of aircraft it could use on route were
also removed. Thus Continental soon applied for an additional two
flights per week out of Nagoya, starting from August 1985. Continental
later upped this to four flights and this was approved in late
July 1985. The agreement also provided for an additional
Japanese airline to serve the routs to Saipan-Guam. However, as this would
require a resolution to the problem of the Japanese air constitution
concerning permitting other Japanese airlines to break JALS monopoly on
international flights, an immediate entry was not expected. The president of ANA
did take the opportunity of the United Airlines's entry to
rephrase his case for ANA international flights as being in
Japan's national interest. JAL, also took the opportunity
presented by this temporary void in international
airline decisions to start flying the jets of Japan Asia Airways
on the route. JAA is 100% owned by JAL and is the only other
Japanese airline approved for international service. Thus far
however, its service has been restricted to Taiwan.
In preparation for the anticipated increased competition
from other Japanese and American airlines entering the Pacific
routes, JAL has decided to beef up its direct flight services, to
provide faster services. Presently JAL flies a Tokyo-Seattle-
Chicago route three times a week. It will be changing this to two
direct flights to Seattle per week and three direct flights to
Chicago each week. It will also be increasing its direct flights
to New York from its present 7 per week to 9 from 1986 and then
to 14 in 1988.
The April 1985 agreement also permitted Nippon Cargo Airline to
begin cargo flights between Japan and San Francisco and New York
five times per week from May 8, 1985. This was several months later than
NCA had hoped. The president of NCA claims that the delay, which cost it
1 billion yen per month, was due to the lobbying efforts of
Flying Tiger Airlines. The NCA president said this was unfair as
the Flying Tiger Airlines had virtually unlimited access to the
Japanese market and was flying 31 flights per week from Japan.
NCA soon concluded an agency agreement with a Hong
Kong subsidiary of its parent company, All Nippon Airways. NCA
expects that initially abut 10% of its ai cargo business will
come from SE Asia. Unfortunately NCA started business
just as the growth of the US economy was beginning to
slow and Japanese exports to the US, particularly the high value
added exports such as computer parts and semiconductors, fell
dramatically.
Flying Tiger Airlines has come in for quite a bit criticism
from its Japanese competitors. NCA claims that its application
was delayed due to the political influence of former President
Gerald Ford. Mr. Ford is a director of Flying Tiger Airlines. The
Japanese claim he used his political influence to block NCA. The
Japanese also assert that national security factors are being
taken into consideration by US aviation authorities. They claim
that the refusal of US authorities to permit NCA and JAL to enter
the Chicago market was due to such factors. They claim that the
Chicago is a very lucrative market for the two airlines providing air
cargo services between Japan and Chicago--Flying Tiger and
Northwest Orient. The US government is said to be particularly
grateful to Flying Tiger Airlines for its airlift services
provided during the Vietnam War, over ten years ago. United
Airlines is said also to be preferred by US authorities as it was
singled out by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General
David Jones "as the first airline to commit itself to the program
for strengthening air transport capability in his report to
Congress on military preparedness." JAL in July 1985 once again asked the
Ministry of Transport to ask the US for permission for it to fly air cargo
flights to Chicago. It noted that the large number of Japanese firms in the
area would provide it with a good market. The Japanese seem to believe that
they have some sort of property rights to Japanese passengers and Japanese
businesses. In recent months however, aviation talks between the US and Japan
have grown heated once more. In November, 1985 the US rejected the
request by NCA for one additional flight to the US per week. Japan asked
Japan asked the US to reconsider this, stating the rejection was in violation
of the April 1985 agreement. The US then reversed itself
and approved the application saying it was only temporary to
handle the heavy Christmas traffic. NCA was asking for the flights
on a charter basis. US aviation authorities were claiming that the April
1985 agreement covered only scheduled flights and chartered flights were not
guaranteed to be approved. The Japanese countered that was not their understanding.
Nevertheless, the US approved one flight only per week and said
this was only an exception. Another case would not be permitted.
For FY 1986 the Japanese government has decided to authorize NCA for 10 charter
flights, cutting that from JAL's quota. Under the April 1985 agreement, both
countries are permitted 300 charter flights per year. ANA also provides
international charter air cargo flights.
Negotiations between the US and Japan are expected to grow
more difficult over the next few months. The April 1985 agreement
permits 3 new American airlines to enter Japan. Soon after the
agreement United announced its takeover of PanAm's Pacific
routes. Japan is very concerned that if left as is, American
airlines will have overwhelming power on the Pacific routes.
Yet the reason given by the US Transportation Department
in approving United's acquisition was that it would permit
American airlines to provide greater competition to JAL on
the Pacific routes, whoch JAL currently dominates.
THE JAPAN LAWLETTER, November, 1985. By Roderick Seeman