DEFAMATION AND BROADCASTING LAW
KEYWORD: DEFAMATION, BROADCASTING LAW, NHK
NHK, a government broadcaster on the lines of BBC, after winning a key victory
reversed itself and showed magnanimity. Having proven its legal point, its
legal rights, it finally admitted it had made a mistake and made up for it.
The problem involved a 1986 program where the plaintiff’s husband said he
had no idea why is wife divorced him. NHK never interviewed the woman to
hear side of the story and she protested her right to defend herself. NHK
refused. In the end the Supreme Court of Japan ruled that the Broadcasting
Law guaranteed freedom for broadcasters. The Supreme Court did agree with
the lower courts award of 1.3 million yen in damages for defamation. Shortly
after the decision NHK aired a broadcast, correcting the original broadcast
and deeply apologizing.
In another case however, a group of farmers settled with TV Asahi for 10
million yen after they had filed a suit claiming that they had been severely
damaged over a news broadcast that sounded like their crop was damaged with
dioxin. The Supreme Court found no basis for the report by the broadcaster
and ordered damages paid.
Criminal defamation was found by the Tokyo prosecutors when they had arrested
4 employees of Tokyo Broadcasting System. A complaint had been filed by Tokyo
Mayor Ishihara. The broadcaster completely misquoted the mayor.
He said:
“I do not intend to absolutely justify the history of the annexation of the
Korean Peninsula by Japan”
The broadcaster reported that he said:
”I intent to absolutely justify the history of the annexation of the Korean
Peninsula by Japan.”
The mayor said the broadcaster intentionally misquoted him.
Copyright 2005. All rights reserved Attorney Roderick H.
Seeman